Fine Art Transitions [Updated]

posted in: Abstracts, Media, Painting | 2

NOTE: I am a contemporary abstract painter. My work may be compared at times to postwar abstract expressionism, and even artists associated with the New York School, but my art is independently derived, and is not directly informed by those artists or any genre label of the period, nor is any of it intended to mimic or imitate any artist or their style. Any works or titles that appear to pay homage would be coincidental. After a four-year hiatus, I am back with new work for 2026. Find them under New Editions.

From 2022: Wanted to turn part of my Florida Room into a studio after stumbling on art I created in 1990, my Reactor piece, while managing the Radiation Department office at Three Mile Island. Having fun merging my photographer’s eye and passion for fractals into the world of abstract expressionist style acrylic painting since July. Artist Wayne Chambers threw some art materials my way, and, Voila! Below are some cropped canvas sample selections, in rough chronological order of their creation, beginning with my first painting: Potter’s Field. NOTE: This post updates with new art creations added somewhat sequentially.

















NEW EDITIONS (2026)










Steven John Thompson
Schiza, 2026
acrylic on canvas
20 in x 30 in
$50,000 unframed

Sometimes, your greatest inspiration will come through encouragement from people who believe in you; but, you cannot rely on that for your artistic growth, because when their deafening silence comes, and it will, at the end of the day, you must commit your talent and its direction to God and yourself, not to the varied, contrary opinions of others less invested than you. Nonetheless, it’s all still going strong here. Remember to rest, reflect, revise, repeat, and then rest.

As far as any argument or contention that oils are superior to acrylics because that’s what the Masters used, reality is, oils are all that the master painters had available in their day and age. If acrylics were available to them, many would have chosen them. Because of the many similarities between oils and acrylics, great painters in acrylics are likely to be great painters in oils, also.


Despite the paintings’ apparent lack of cohesion to the uneducated eye, these artists cultivated the interplay of skill and unplanned occurrences to determine the painting’s final outcome.

Comment on Abstract Expressionists at thoughtco.com

‘Sold’ a modified print of Potter’s Field on Day One. Here it is, owner-framed.

So, happy with this new direction. Stay tuned for more…

Oh, and here’s a digital copy of Reactor. Original work is believed to be lost.

Steven John Thompson
Reactor, 1990
mixed media

Free syntaxicon!

My Multi-Touch ebook with poetry, photography, music, and voice, publicly available in the Apple Bookstore, is no longer available for sale. Instead, moving forward, I am offering syntaxicon as a free PDF version comprised of original text and image. Please access syntaxicon here for download today, and enjoy. Thank you.

Combative Christians vs. Combat Christianity

Put on the whole armor of God, that you may be able to stand against the wiles of the devil. For we do not wrestle against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this age, against spiritual hosts of wickedness in the heavenly places.

Ephesians 6:11-12 (KJV)

One of the most declarative sections of scripture lays out the battle or struggle the Christian faces in this life. It is a battle against “spiritual hosts of wickedness in the heavenly places.” I like the King James Version of these verses for semantic reasons: armor, wrestle, etc. Let’s unpack some of this command.

The Whole Armor of God

Paul is going to describe this armor a few verses down, but the only thing that I wish to say about the armor is that it is not physical. With that said, we can then understand what Paul tells us about our struggle in that armor: we wrestle. Wrestling in physical armor is impractical and will lead to loss. Think about a wrestling match: two opponents dressed in barely more than their skivvies. Wrestling is one-on-one combat. That’s important. Paul mentions two prospective opponents for our one-on-one wrestling.

Our Opponents

Clearly, at the very start of our struggle, we must recognize that “we do not wrestle with flesh and blood,” so let’s get that out of the way. The only things we knowingly have in our world that consist of flesh and blood are the animal kingdom, perhaps insects, if we may lean in that direction, and humans. But because Paul concludes these verses with “the heavenly,” we are not fighting earthly human creatures in our present day and age. That means human beings are not our enemy, to Paul here. More specifically, humans are not to be our target. We cannot wrestle with humans, physically, in any way that would warrant our need to “put on the whole armor of God.” People are not the enemy of the Christian. Our neighbor, the mailman, our spouse, it doesn’t matter who is the human, we are not to physically wrestle with this person in this life as if God wills it. We are not in direct physical combat with any persons who may oppose us, like it or not, at war or not, locked up or not, not as ‘servants of God.’

We are in combat with unseen forces, Paul says early on here, with “the wiles of the devil,” and our status in such circumstance is “to stand.” Standing is not an offensive position, but is defensive. Since Paul immediately moves from standing against the devil to not wrestling with humans, we can see a direct comparison that includes a do and a do not and another do: Do stand, don’t wrestle humans, do wrestle “principalities”…”powers”…rulers of the darkness of this age”…”spiritual hosts of wickedness.”

Combative Christians

We may put on “the armor of God” only because we are in God’s service, the service of the King, and may therefore help fight for his cause. Again, Paul is clear here: God’s cause is against the devil and his minions, not other humans, even when they appear to be downright devilish. This does not mean we are not to do the right thing when confronting evil and fight it as necessary. We are built with conscience.

And Paul’s edict is not offensive, but defensive. If we think we are at war with humanity as the enemy of God, and that we are not only free, but instructed, to attack other people as such, we are not in the will of God. Our armor is broken, overall ineffectual, in self-defeat. We can go through the motions of putting it on, even getting corporate approval from others going through the motions, and we can target individuals we believe are enemies to us and our religious agenda, but that combativeness is not by God’s request. We may even hear voices telling us to be aggressive toward others, on whatever grounds we may come up with; again, even corporately, that does not comport with Paul’s instructions.

We are not at war with people. The sport of wrestling, again, is one-on-one. If we are wrestling with “flesh and blood,” then that is our struggle opponent. The reason Paul posits that dynamic against what we are to wrestle is because he knows we can only do one or the other at one time. Wrestling against human opponents means we must neglect the real wrestling we are called to against spiritual wickedness in high places. That spiritual wickedness may therefore feed off of our neglect, perhaps even be raised to greater heights since we are off-track and out of the will of God by wrestling with flesh and blood. It is one or the other, and Paul would have it that a far less destructive force of humans benefit, rather than wicked principalities and powers of the age further prospering by wiles of the devil.

Combat Christianity

Christians consider their enemies to be the world, the flesh, and the devil. And scripture is replete with instructions for addressing these three forces. The world is the world system that builds around us without the direct input and recognition of God. A humanism that denies God exists or has a valid say in the conversation for the birth and progress of humanity. We may fight it by calling it out as such and seeking to fill any gaps with scripture that may apply. Many great scholars and theologians have fought back against the world system as so. But it is not a fight against other humans. The devil is behind it.

The flesh to any Christian is the lust and idolatry inherent to the human condition. Even if other people are involved intimately in a temptation, those people are not the enemy of the Christian any more than the Christian is the enemy of those participants. The Book of Romans is clear about this dynamic. When it comes to the enmity of the flesh for the Christian, others are not to blame, but the Christian is guilty. While the devil may be behind it, the devil does not get the actual blame for sins of the flesh. We do.

The devil as the enemy of the Christian needs no introduction or exegesis. Scripture clearly identifies and elaborates extensively on the Satan creature falling to Earth for pride and thereby becoming the enemy of mankind through devious interactions in the Garden, as Adam and Eve yielded their devotion.

Conclusion

Wrestling against the wrong force will cripple the force it was not intended to wrestle with, while empowering the force it does not take on properly. Do we see wicked principalities in power today? Have we helped propel them there? Have we made the people Christ died for our personal enemies? Some of the answers lie in who we really are. Are we CINOs? Are we regenerated? Are we self-deluded?

I can’t answer those questions for anyone else. But I can look around and see what it appears is happening in our world in our time. Evil seems to be unbridled and installed at the top. It didn’t get there on its own, but was elected and maintained by people who consider other people to be their enemies. That is neither the gospel of Christ nor the heart of God. Any so-called Christian concerned with anything but fulfilling the gospel of Christ or understanding and sharing the heart of God is out of the will of God. It’s no deeper than that. Can we be out of the will of God on a grand scale and still be Christians. Sure. But, likely, not for long.

While humanity is in a dispensation of grace, and God says all is forgiven, just come to Me, judgment of this world is not where we are at in history; but, according to Peter, the stage we are at is the judgment of believers (1 Peter 4:17). Well-meaning Christians who think they are fighting against other humans, when they do damage to those persons God died for, in or outside the Church, are to be judged here and now. See some of their downfalls in our news. Peter also says to be of a sober mind, considering…

By Microsoft - https://www.linkedin.com, Public Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=124190704

Linkedin Nonsense

posted in: News, Technology | 0

Rejoined Linkedin after a 10-year hiatus. Was going great til it insisted I upload a government ID for access. Have seen where others did and still were denied access. Hard pass. It’s over.

Cognella

Great News

posted in: Media, News | 0

I am contracted with Cognella Academic Publishing for 2026 publication of my Understanding Information Literacy: Strategies in Processing Everyday Information textbook, and 2027 publication of my Digital Media Profiteers: Provocateurs, Jesters, and Propagandists textbook.

The Christian Lifestyle Paradox

posted in: Apologetics, Culture, Spiritual | 0

In the 42 years of my life as a Christian, I have never heard a message preached from the pulpit on the dangers of the hypocritical lifestyle.

Yet pastors over the past few decades have very comfortably thrown stones at LGBTQ people as someone to love while the sin of the ‘lifestyle’ must be condemned. This is constant, and recurring, even heard this week from Joyce Meyer, who looked visibly baffled, as she put it, by the whole ‘gay’ thing.

After hearing her lecture, it’s understandable why her church members may not want to come to her for counsel on the topic. They likely just sit back and suck it up; after all, she claims to have ‘the anointing’ and no sensible Christian would want to take that on. Yet, in reality, all who believe have the anointing as far as teaching and learning go: “But the anointing that you received from him abides in you, and you have no need that anyone should teach you. But as his anointing teaches you about everything, and is true, and is no lie—just as it has taught you, abide in him…” 1 John 2:27.

Some of this negligence may be understandable, as Meyer no doubt has her hands full with sinners of divorce among her followers. They’re likely holding onto Jesus’ comments in Mark 10 looking for partner infidelity as a way out, and likely being taught that is a valid reason, but that’s not what Jesus says. His contention is that if one divorces other than for fornication or sexual impropriety, it causes the individual to be available for porneia, or sexual impropriety, when partner sexual impropriety has already occurred. It’s not permission. He brings in Moses to verify that divorce was permitted because of their hardened hearts. But God never changed: “For I hate divorce…” Malachi 2:16a. Of course forgiveness is available, as with any sin, but rushing into another marriage is rather presumptuous.

So what’s going on with her bafflement on the ‘gay’ thing?

People have been the same across the centuries, there is nothing new about human nature under the sun. What did Jesus say about the ‘gay lifestyle’ while he was here?

* crickets *

Apart from Jesus telling people caught up in sexual intercourse outside of a marriage bond to stop doing so, the closest we can get to Jesus addressing ‘homosexuality’ is the emasculating tribal ritual of Sodom that its leaders put upon visitors to the Godforsaken place. Oddly enough, Jesus claims that Sodom would be justified compared to those who reject the kingdom of God and will suffer greater judgment (Luke 10:12). This is astonishing. Never preached.

So one argument may be that gay people were not an issue in the time of Jesus, culturally. Which is absurd. Jesus had 12 men he called to follow him and the idea that they were all straight in their sexual orientation is kinda pie in the sky. John, for one, highly questionable. Yet that seems to be the preferred status for people in rapt denial.

Back to lifestyle. Jesus had a lot to say about one lifestyle that he witnessed that was so disgusting to him that he condemned it, page after page. It was a ‘hypocritical’ lifestyle adopted by religious leaders of the day. A wide assortment of scriptures testify to Jesus publicly calling out this abomination and his frustration with its adherents.

Okay, so, whatever happened to the ‘hypocritical lifestyle’ since Jesus was here and condemned it? Did it disappear when he did? No, it continued to flourish and grow, and we can witness it today in virtually every pulpit.

While it’s no mystery why pastors like Joyce Meyer don’t dedicate their time and energy to condemning the hypocritical lifestyle when it’s so much easier to get audience support on condemning LGBTQ, who is more likely to be committing this sin that Jesus railed about continually, and who are these hypocrites who contributed intimately to his [requisite] death, overall, his place on the cross? Religious leaders caught up in their hypocritical lifestyle.

Christianity Today published their fascinating article on pastors and porn a while back. Less than 1% of pastors would let their congregation know they are caught up in porn. That’s more than 99% of today’s ‘Christian’ spiritual leaders surveyed in the study living a hypocritical lifestyle. Yet they have the gaul to condemn others for their lifestyle, when they are consumed and debased by their own lusts, but in secret. And don’t think for a moment that these pastors caught up in porn aren’t ever looking at gay porn. Fat chance. Their clueless spouses all walking around, proud, pushing the kids in their strollers with their ice cream cones while at Doodlebug Park.

The Apostle Paul wasn’t silent on the matter. While Romans 1 condemns the reprobate lifestyle of the idolator, Romans 2 condemns the envious reprobate hypocrite pointing the finger at the idolator in Romans 1. Paul wraps up this duality of the human condition in Romans 3, where all have sinned and are found guilty before God, in need of his provided redemption through Jesus Christ.

But we can go back to Jesus again and the Prodigal in Luke 15, who lived a debauched lifestyle before coming to his senses. The story doesn’t end with him coming home and God falling onto his neck in unconditional love. The older brother, the hypocrite who did not do what his younger brother did, yet called him out in critical judgement, actually did what his younger brother had done: not in overt behavior, but in his jealous heart. And he didn’t own up to the hypocrisy in his lifestyle. Just like today’s pastors in the pulpit won’t confront their hypocritical lifestyles.

The next time a religious figure condemns gay people for their ‘lifestyle’ just look at them and ask yourself, do they have a hypocritical lifestyle problem? Chances are, you know the answer. But, whatever you do, don’t hate them.

Hate their sin.

Famously Yours…

posted in: Adventure, Culture, Media | 0

I’m not entirely sure as to why I feel the need to post this publicly, though feel it may be cathartic somewhat privately. Regardless, I am posting in public for the fun of it. It’s a partial list of famous people that I have met over the years, in various situations, whether serving, talking, working, or just partying with them. It’s been a magical ride. FWIW, some great nightclubs that I’ve been to include Studio 54, Studio One, Circus Disco, clubs in Munich and Jerusalem, among others. I was a non-union actor and character model for a number of years. Good times!

John Adams. Composer.

Keith Barish. Producer.

John Berendt. Author.

Beau Bridges. Actor.

Tony Danza. Actor.

Richard Deacon. Actor.

Bucky Dent. Baseball Player, NY Yankees.

Divine. Actress.

Eileen Ford. Founder, Ford Models.

Rudolf “Rudi” Gernreich, Fashion Designer.

Nancy Honeytree. Musician.

Ron Huldai. Mayor, Tel Aviv.

Garrison Keillor. Author.

Valerie Landsburg. Actress.

Edith Massey. Actress.

Willie Nelson. Singer.

Twila Paris. Singer.

Lester Persky. Producer.

Suzanne Pleshette. Actress.

Robert Rauschenberg. Artist.

Craig Russell. Performer.

Mimi Sheraton. Food Critic, NY Times.

Edwin Starr. Singer.

Stephen Stucker. Actor.

Rip Torn. Actor.

Abe Vigoda. Actor.

Andy Warhol. Artist.

John Waters. Filmmaker.

LeRoy Zimmerman. Attorney General, Pennsylvania.